Old Spanish, also known as Old Castilian (Spanish: castellano antiguo; Old Spanish: romance castellano pronounced [ro'man?e kaste'?ano]) or Medieval Spanish (Spanish: español medieval), originally a colloquial Latin spoken in the provinces of the Roman Empire that provided the root for the early form of the Spanish language that was spoken on the Iberian Peninsula from the 10th century until roughly the beginning of the 15th century, before a consonantal readjustment gave rise to the evolution of modern Spanish. The poem Cantar de Mio Cid (The Poem of the Cid), published around 1200, remains the best known and most extensive work of literature in Old Spanish.
Video Old Spanish language
Phonetics and phonology
The phonological system of Old Spanish was quite similar to that of other medieval Romance languages.
Sibilants
Among the consonants, there were seven sibilants, including three sets of voiceless/voiced pairs:
- Voiceless alveolar affricate /t?s?/: represented by ?ç? before ?a?, ?o?, ?u?, and by ?c? before ?e? or ?i?
- Voiced alveolar affricate /d?z?/: represented by ?z?
- Voiceless apicoalveolar fricative /s?/: represented by ?s? in word-initial and word-final positions and before and after a consonant, and by ?ss? between vowels
- Voiced apicoalveolar fricative /z?/: represented by ?s? between vowels and before voiced consonants
- Voiceless postalveolar fricative /?/: represented by ?x? (pronounced like the English digraph ?sh?)
- Voiced postalveolar fricative /?/: represented by ?j?, and (often) by ?g? before ?e? or ?i? (pronounced like the si in English vision)
- Voiceless postalveolar affricate /t??/: represented by ?ch?
This set of sounds is identical to that found in medieval Portuguese, and almost the same as the system present in the modern Mirandese language.
The Modern Spanish system evolved from the Old Spanish one through the following changes:
- The affricates /t?s?/ and /d?z?/ were simplified to laminodental fricatives /s?/ and /z?/, which remained distinct from the apicoalveolar sounds /s?/ and /z?/ (a distinction also present in Basque).
- The voiced sibilants then all lost their voicing, merging with the voiceless ones. (Voicing remains before voiced consonants, e.g. mismo, desde, but only allophonically.)
- The merged /?/ was retracted to /x/.
- The merged /s?/ was drawn forward to /?/. In Andalusia and the Canary Islands, however (and as a result, in Latin America), the merged /s?/ was instead drawn forward, merging into /s?/.
Changes 2-4 all occurred in a short period of time, around 1550-1600. The change from /?/ to /x/ is comparable to the same shift occurring in Modern Swedish (see sj-sound).
The Old Spanish spelling of the sibilants was identical to modern Portuguese spelling, which, unlike Spanish, still preserves most of the sounds the medieval language and thus is still a mostly faithful representation of the spoken language; Spanish was respelled in 1815 to reflect the pronunciation.
Examples:
- passar "to pass" vs. casar "to marry" (Modern Spanish pasar, casar, cf. Portuguese passar, casar)
- osso "bear" vs. oso "I dare" (Modern Spanish oso in both cases, cf. Portuguese urso [a borrowing from Latin], ouso)
- foces "sickles" vs. fozes "throats/ravines" (Modern Spanish hoces in both cases, cf. Portuguese foices, fozes)
- coxo "lame" vs. cojo "I seize" (Modern Spanish cojo in both cases, cf. Portuguese coxo, colho)
- xefe (Modern Spanish jefe, cf. Portuguese chefe)
- Xeres (Modern Spanish Jerez, cf. Portuguese Xerez)
- oxalá (Modern Spanish ojalá, cf. Portuguese oxalá)
- dexar (Modern Spanish dejar, cf. Portuguese deixar)
- roxo (Modern Spanish rojo, cf. Portuguese roxo)
- fazer or facer (Modern Spanish hacer, cf. Portuguese fazer)
- dezir (Modern Spanish decir, cf. Portuguese dizer)
- lança (Modern Spanish lanza, cf. Portuguese lança)
The Old Spanish origins of jeque and jerife reflect their Arabic origins, xeque from Arabic sheikh and xerife from Arabic sharif.
b and v
The letters ?b? and ?v? still had distinct pronunciations; ?b? still represented a stop consonant [b] in all positions, while ?v? was likely pronounced as a voiced bilabial fricative or approximant [?] or [??] (although word-initially it may have been pronounced [b]). The use of ?b? and ?v? in Old Spanish largely corresponded to their use in Modern Portuguese, which still distinguishes the two sounds (with the exception of Galician and some northern Portuguese dialects); the use of two phonemes also occurs in standard Valencian spoken in eastern Catalonia and some areas in southern Catalonia, Balearic dialect, as well as in Alguerese (except standard Catalan in eastern Catalonia). When Spanish spelling was changed in 1815, words with ?b? and ?v? were respelled etymologically in order to match Latin spelling whenever possible.
Examples:
- aver (Modern Spanish haber, cf. Latin HAB?RE, Portuguese haver)
- caber (Modern Spanish caber, cf. Latin CAPERE, Portuguese caber)
- bever (Modern Spanish beber, cf. Latin BIBERE; Portuguese beber < older bever)
- bivir or vivir (Modern Spanish vivir, cf. Latin V?VERE, Portuguese viver)
- amava (Modern Spanish amaba, cf. Latin AM?BAM/AM?BAT, Portuguese amava)
- saber (Modern Spanish saber, cf. Latin SAPERE, Portuguese saber)
- livro (Modern Spanish libro, cf. Latin L?BER, Portuguese livro)
- palavra (Modern Spanish palabra, cf. Latin PARABOLA, Portuguese palavra)
The Spanish place name Córdova (which became the English name of Córdoba) reflects the Old Spanish spelling and Arabic origin Qur?ubah, and Álava reflects the Basque origin Araba.
f and h
Many words now written with an ?h? were written with ?f? in Old Spanish, although it was likely pronounced [h] in most positions (but [?] or [f] before /r/, /l/, [w] and possibly [j]). The cognates of these words in Portuguese and most other Romance languages have [f]. Other words now spelled with an etymological ?h? were spelled without any such consonant in Old Spanish (e.g. haber, written aver in Old Spanish); these words have cognates in other Romance languages without [f] (e.g. French avoir, Italian avere, Portuguese haver with silent etymological ?h?).
Examples:
- fablar (Modern Spanish hablar, Portuguese falar)
- fazer or facer (Modern Spanish hacer, Portuguese fazer)
- fijo (Modern Spanish hijo, Portuguese filho)
- foces "sickles", fozes "throats/ravines" (Modern Spanish hoces, Portuguese foices, fozes)
- follín (Modern Spanish hollín)
- ferir (Modern Spanish herir, Portuguese ferir)
- fiel (Modern Spanish fiel, Portuguese fiél)
- fuerte (Modern Spanish fuerte, Portuguese forte)
- flor (Modern Spanish flor, Portuguese flor)
Modern words with ?f? before a vowel mostly represent learned or semi-learned borrowings from Latin, e.g. fumar "to smoke" (compare inherited humo "smoke"), satisfacer "to satisfy" (compare hacer "to make"), fábula "fable, rumor" (compare hablar "to speak"). Certain modern words with ?f? that have doublets in ?h? may represent dialectal developments or early borrowings from neighboring languages, e.g. fierro "branding iron" (compare hierro "iron"), fondo "bottom" (compare hondo "deep"), Fernando "Ferdinand" (compare Hernando).
ch
Old Spanish had ?ch?, just as Modern Spanish does. This mostly represents a development of earlier */tj/ (still preserved in Portuguese and French), from Latin CT. (The use of ?ch? for /t??/ originated in Old French and spread to Spanish, Portuguese and English, despite the different origins of the sound in each language.)
Examples:
- leite (Modern Spanish leche "milk", Latin lactem, cf. Portuguese leite, French lait)
- muito (Modern Spanish mucho "much", Latin multum, cf. Portuguese muito, French moult (rare, regional))
- noite (Modern Spanish noche "night", Latin noctem, cf. Portuguese noite, French nuit)
- oito (Modern Spanish ocho "eight", Latin oct?, cf. Portuguese oito, French huit)
- feito (Modern Spanish hecho "made" or "fact", Latin factum, cf. Portuguese feito, French fait)
Palatal nasal
The palatal nasal /?/ was written ?nn? (the geminate NN being one of the sound's Latin origins), but was often abbreviated to ?ñ? following the common scribal shorthand of replacing an ?m? or ?n? with a tilde above the previous letter. In later times ?ñ? was used exclusively, and came to be considered a letter in its own right by Modern Spanish. Also as in modern times, the palatal lateral /?/ was indicated with ?ll? (again reflecting an origin from a Latin geminate).
Greek digraphs
The Graeco-Latin digraphs (i.e. digraphs in words of Greek-Latin origin) ?ch?, ?ph?, ?(r)rh? and ?th? were reduced to ?c?, ?f?, ?(r)r? and ?t?, respectively.
Examples:
- christiano (Modern Spanish cristiano)
- triumpho (Modern Spanish triunfo)
- myrrha (Modern Spanish mirra)
- theatro (Modern Spanish teatro)
Maps Old Spanish language
Spelling
In common with other European languages before c.1600, the letters ?i? and ?j? were not distinguished, nor were ?u? and ?v?. Modern editions of Old Spanish texts usually normalize the spelling to distinguish them as the modern language does.
Morphology and syntax
In Old Spanish, perfect constructions of movement verbs, such as ir ('(to) go') and venir ('(to) come'), were formed using the auxiliary verb ser ('(to) be'), as in Italian and French. For example, Las mugieres son llegadas a Castiella vs. Modern Spanish Las mujeres han llegado a Castilla ('The women have arrived in Castilla').
Possession was expressed with the verb aver (Modern Spanish haber, '(to) have') rather than tener. For example: Pedro ha dos fijas vs. Modern Spanish Pedro tiene dos hijas ('Pedro has two daughters').
In the perfect tenses, the past participle often agreed with the gender and number of the direct object. For example, María ha cantadas dos canciones vs. Modern Spanish María ha cantado dos canciones ('María has sung two songs'), yet this was inconsistent even in the earliest texts.
Personal pronouns and substantives were placed after the verb in any tense or mood unless a word with stress was present before the verb.
The future and conditional tenses were not yet fully grammaticalised as inflexions; rather, they were still periphrastic formations of the verb aver in the present or imperfect indicative followed by the infinitive of a main verb. Pronouns, therefore, following general placement rules, could be inserted between the main verb and the auxiliary in these periphrastic tenses. Compare this phenomenon with European Portuguese (mesoclisis):
- E dixo: - Tornar-m-é a Jherusalem. (Fazienda de Ultra Mar, 194)
- Y dijo: - Me tornaré a Jerusalén. (literal translation into Modern Spanish)
- E disse: - Tornar-me-ei a Jerusalém. (literal translation into Portuguese)
- And he said: "I will return to Jerusalem." (English translation)
- En pennar gelo he por lo que fuere guisado (Cantar de mio Cid, 92)
- Se lo empeñaré por lo que sea razonable (Modern Spanish equivalent)
- Penhorar-lho-ei por o que for razoável (Portuguese equivalent)
- I will pawn it to them for whatever is reasonable (English translation)
When there was a stressed word before the verb, the pronouns would go before the verb: e.g., non gelo empeñar he por lo que fuere guisado.
Generally, an unstressed pronoun and a verb in simple sentences combined into one word. In a compound sentence, the pronoun was found in the beginning of the clause. Example: la manol va besar = la mano le va a besar.
In comparison with the modern language, the future subjunctive was in common use (fuere in the second example above) whereas today it is generally found only in legal or solemn discourse, and in the spoken language in some dialects, particularly in areas of Venezuela replacing the imperfect subjunctive. It was used similarly to its Modern Portuguese counterpart, in place of the modern present subjunctive in a subordinate clause after si, cuando, etc., when an event in the future is referenced.
- Si vos assi lo fizieredes e la ventura me fuere complida
- Mando al vuestro altar buenas donas e Ricas (Cantar de mio Cid, 223-224)
- Si vosotros así lo hiciereis y la suerte me favorece,
- Mando a vuestro altar ofrendas buenas y ricas (modern equivalent)
- If you do so and fortune is favourable toward me,
- I will send to your altar fine and rich offerings (English translation)
Vocabulary
Sample text
The following is a sample from Cantar de Mio Cid (lines 330-365), with abbreviations resolved, punctuation (the original has none), and some modernized letters. Below, the original Old Spanish text in the first column is presented, along with the same sample in modern Spanish in the second column and an English translation in the third column.
See also
- History of the Spanish language
- Early Modern Spanish (Middle Spanish)
References
External links
- An explanation of the development of Mediaeval Spanish sibilants in Castile and Andalusia.
Source of article : Wikipedia
0 Comments